All submissions will be double-blind peer-reviewed by 2 reviewers and assessed on the following evaluation criteria:
1. Overall quality (weight = 10 points)
2. Relevance to the conference theme and to the subtheme (weight = 10 points)
3. Significance for educational practice and policy / interestingness for the community and practical grounding (weight = 10 points)
4. Clear definition of the question(s)/problem(s) (weight = 10 points)
5. Clarity of procedure and/or instruments used to explore the question(s)/problem(s) (weight = 10 points)
6. Conceptual framework – link to literature (weight = 10 points)
7. Developmental value and practical originality (weight = 10 points)
8. Clarity of findings and interpretations (weight = 10 points)
9. Organisation and structure and clarity/quality of language (weight = 10 points)
10. Proposed interactivity (weight = 10 points)
This review will result in a mark out of 100. You will be informed on the result by Monday 6 October 2008 at the latest.
